About
Contact
Donate
Register
Log in

Game Theory finally did a Persona Theory.
Click to go to bottom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJoQDqn0WRw Just telling
- - - How bad is it? - - -
Pineapple
Thread Creator
#3

He messed up Margaret and called her Elizabeth.
He messed up Margaret and called her Elizabeth.
- - - Game Theory needs to be stopped. - - -
Somebody kill me please.
Pineapple
Thread Creator
#6

End us all.
Can, game theory please stop, like, game theory is becoming content that's almost at the level of 'Behind The Meme'.
- - - We should make a petition to stop Game Theory. - - -
He messed up Margaret and called her Elizabeth. I bet this is just a simple error.
https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stop-game-theory made a petition
Pineapple
Thread Creator
#11

https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stop-game-theory made a petition Yes, Perfect
Pineapple... I think you're over exaggerating by this. This is Mat Pat's first Persona Theory and mistakes are bound to slip out of the cracks.
Pineapple... I think you're over exaggerating by this. This is Mat Pat's first Persona Theory and mistakes are bound to slip out of the cracks.
- - - With the sheer amount of pointless research that goes into these theories then mistakes such as this are inexcusable. - - -
BIG RIGSSS! Pineapple... I think you're over exaggerating by this. This is Mat Pat's first Persona Theory and mistakes are bound to slip out of the cracks. I dont think this is over exaggeration, MatPat is just fucking stupid.
Pineapple
Thread Creator
#15

I am not hating on him, some of his videos are okay. Just the quality dropped on the newer Videos. Also the Theory has no good base. Fither had with their fake teddie Lucifer video better arguments and proof.
Yeah he over thinks and over complicates. So what? Theory is a theory no matter how outlandish or dumb it may sound.
Yeah he over thinks and over complicates. So what? Theory is a theory no matter how outlandish or dumb it may sound. A theroy is supposed to be based off of evidence, and other means. Its like making a debate, but its like its possible, but not impossible. Lets say someone says: 'Akira is a lizard' with no goddamn evidence, its not a fucking theory.
Pineapple
Thread Creator
#18

Yeah he over thinks and over complicates. So what? Theory is a theory no matter how outlandish or dumb it may sound. A theroy is supposed to be based off of evidence, and other means. Its like making a debate, but its like its possible, but not impossible. Lets say someone says: 'Akira is a lizard' with no goddamn evidence, its not a fucking theory. Not that angry but I agree with the evidence. A good Theory has evidence backing it up.
Unit_Specter is only half correct, having a theory that is outlandish can be put out as a theory, however requires stronger evidence . Having a theory with no evidence is just an opinion. Im going to put it his way. Evidence + Statement = Theroy Statement + No Evidence ≠ Theroy
I theorize that Akira is a Kamen Rider
I theorize that Akira is a Kamen Rider completely agree holy shit, akira kamen rider comfirmed
- - - I theorize that Persona 5 is not actually a work of fiction, everything is real and they make you agree that it's not just to throw you off. - - -
Gin
#23

At least his theory wasn't that "Teddie was a shadow" like I feared it was since that point is mentioned in the game itself. Also, he used the Anime as a source for Yu's name but seemed to conveniently forget that the anime also showed Yu fighting his shadow. And that Marie exists. And (Correct me if I'm wrong) that Izanami gave Yu his persona in the first place, so the whole argument is pretty much moot.
Pineapple
Thread Creator
#24

At least his theory wasn't that "Teddie was a shadow" like I feared it was since that point is mentioned in the game itself. Also, he used the Anime as a source for Yu's name but seemed to conveniently forget that the anime also showed Yu fighting his shadow. And that Marie exists. And (Correct me if I'm wrong) that Izanami gave Yu his persona in the first place, so the whole argument is pretty much moot. Exactly, the Marie part also was in my mind. My wish is only that he does the research fully not half bare.
Game Theory has a major problem with critical research failure, the guy running it just does a lot of cherry picking details, intentionally or not, he still misses very obvious details sometimes that throws a wrench into his theories. In this case, he again seems to have done exactly that, and made a claim that the game itself all but directly tells him is an incorrect claim. It honestly makes me wonder if he actually read half the text in the game, or if he even looked at the true ending. Also the Elizabeth/Margaret mix-up is just dumb. A minor mistake? Sure, but you could have at least fixed it. With all those fancy video editors, he can't correct a name slip-up?
Can I help too? I WILL MAKE SURE MATPAT WILL BE STOPPED
Just spent 30 minutes looking through the comment section of the video. God, all of the comments defending him are cancerous...
It's not the first name slip up either. He's done tons of stupid shit in his youtube career. Just look at his For Honor video for a grand example of how unbelievably wrong he can be over things that are documented in our actual history that he claims to have studied extensively.
"Yu has no shadow" https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/2/24/Shadow_Yu.png/revision/latest?cb=20140607142843 ??????
Tbf the arena shadows are different from TV Shadows.
Yes, Matpat is beary wrong. You should stop digging, the truth is unbearable. Let's all just be happy that things weren't more grizzly. Ha! They shall never know my secret!
Does this mean my love for sensei isn't beary gay?
Normally I'd defend MatPat, but after watching that video, I find that very hard to do. Honestly it's hard to watch that opening he did for it, and not think he is doing an April Fools joke or something. He never once mentioned the gas-station attendant, which as we all know (by now since it's 10 years later as he kept saying again and again) was Izanami, who gave Yu, Adachi, and Namatame their powers. Also, while he did mention. Those three, he tried to say that Adachi had a shadow in the form of Amino-sagiri...which would a simple mistake, had Adachi not just got his butt kicked while using his own persona, Magatsu-Izanagi. Which as Mat claimed to understand, wouldn't be possible. Honestly, he could've made a better theory video had he talked about how Mitsuo Kubo didn't get a Persona...that might have been interesting to think about...but to think that Teddie is Yu's Shadow is grasping at some very thin straws.
Does this mean my love for sensei isn't beary gay? The Champ can answer this one. It's still gay.
I dont wanna get that video in my history, can someone tell me whether or not its the same theory from the video fither made about teddy being satan? because i have a big feeling that's the case here.
I can't remember the last time I watched GT. It was probably around the same time he started sucking the life out of FNAF.
Inb4 someone makes a shadow matpat rp
That video was a waste of time :P
You have to be to logged in to post
Register
Username Password Email
(optional, used only to recover your password, can be added later)
×
Log in
Forgot password?
×